Re: [HACKERS] perltidy

2011-11-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > How much do we care about applying perltidy, as described in > src/tools/msvc/README, everywhere? I just ran it across the entire > tree, using > > perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix **/*.pl **/*.pm > > and it generated 6531 lines of (unified) diff, of which 3

Re: [HACKERS] perltidy

2011-06-14 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 21:39, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> How much do we care about applying perltidy, as described in >> src/tools/msvc/README, everywhere?  I just ran it across the entire >> tree, using >> >> perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix **/*.pl **/*.pm >>

Re: [HACKERS] perltidy

2011-06-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > How much do we care about applying perltidy, as described in > src/tools/msvc/README, everywhere? I just ran it across the entire > tree, using > > perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix **/*.pl **/*.pm > > and it generated 6531 lines of (unified) diff, of which 3

[HACKERS] perltidy

2011-06-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
How much do we care about applying perltidy, as described in src/tools/msvc/README, everywhere? I just ran it across the entire tree, using perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix **/*.pl **/*.pm and it generated 6531 lines of (unified) diff, of which 357 are in src/tools/msvc/ itself. So

Re: [HACKERS] perltidy

2010-04-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 18:24, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On m?n, 2010-04-19 at 17:02 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> The MSVC scripts currently have a "perltidy coding style" so we run > >> perltidy with a specific set of arguments to format the code. (This is > >> in

Re: [HACKERS] perltidy

2010-04-19 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 18:24, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On mån, 2010-04-19 at 17:02 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> The MSVC scripts currently have a "perltidy coding style" so we run >> perltidy with a specific set of arguments to format the code. (This is >> in the README). Kind of like pginde

Re: [HACKERS] perltidy

2010-04-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On mån, 2010-04-19 at 17:02 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > The MSVC scripts currently have a "perltidy coding style" so we run > perltidy with a specific set of arguments to format the code. (This is > in the README). Kind of like pgindent. > > Should we be doing this on all the perlscripts we us

Re: [HACKERS] perltidy

2010-04-19 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Magnus Hagander wrote: The MSVC scripts currently have a "perltidy coding style" so we run perltidy with a specific set of arguments to format the code. (This is in the README). Kind of like pgindent. Should we be doing this on all the perlscripts we use? And if we do, we should obviously use

[HACKERS] perltidy

2010-04-19 Thread Magnus Hagander
The MSVC scripts currently have a "perltidy coding style" so we run perltidy with a specific set of arguments to format the code. (This is in the README). Kind of like pgindent. Should we be doing this on all the perlscripts we use? And if we do, we should obviously use the same one everywhere -