Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers

2011-02-10 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > A few other ones that could use more reviewers include: I've just corrected the status of a few patches in the CommitFest application. In particular, I set the following back to Needs Review. SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw Self-tuning checkpoint sy

Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers

2011-02-10 Thread Noah Misch
[Cc: trimmed] On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:45:11PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > A few other ones that could use more reviewers include: > key locks I'll take a look at this one. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.

Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers

2011-02-09 Thread Bernd Helmle
--On 9. Februar 2011 13:45:11 -0500 Robert Haas wrote: Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that could use more eyes: I'd happily jump in and look into one of those, but before mid of next week i rea

Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers

2011-02-09 Thread Stephen Frost
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or > Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that > could use more eyes: > > MULTISET functions I'll work on this one. > Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to m

[HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers

2011-02-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:09 PM, David E. Wheeler >> wrote: >> > Frankly, I think you should surrender some of those 14 and cajole some >> > other folks to take on more. >> >> Happily...  only