Pavel Stehule writes:
> 2011/7/14 Alvaro Herrera :
>> Thanks ... I expect you're going to resubmit the patch based on David's
>> last version and my comments?
> yes, see a attachment
Applied with some editorial adjustments.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers m
Hello
2011/7/14 Alvaro Herrera :
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of jue jul 14 16:25:56 -0400 2011:
>> 2011/7/14 Alvaro Herrera :
>> > A couple items for this patch:
>
>> it is good idea
>
> Thanks ... I expect you're going to resubmit the patch based on David's
> last version and my comme
2011/7/14 Alvaro Herrera :
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of jue jul 14 16:25:56 -0400 2011:
>> 2011/7/14 Alvaro Herrera :
>> > A couple items for this patch:
>
>> it is good idea
>
> Thanks ... I expect you're going to resubmit the patch based on David's
> last version and my comments?
>
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of jue jul 14 16:25:56 -0400 2011:
> 2011/7/14 Alvaro Herrera :
> > A couple items for this patch:
> it is good idea
Thanks ... I expect you're going to resubmit the patch based on David's
last version and my comments?
--
Álvaro Herrera
The PostgreSQL Comp
2011/7/14 Alvaro Herrera :
> A couple items for this patch:
>
> The docs state that the variable to receive each diagnostic value needs
> to be "of the right data type" but fails to specify what it is. I think
> it'd be good to turn that into a table with three
> columns: name, type, description.
A couple items for this patch:
The docs state that the variable to receive each diagnostic value needs
to be "of the right data type" but fails to specify what it is. I think
it'd be good to turn that into a table with three
columns: name, type, description.
This seems poor style:
+
On Jul 7, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> thank you very much for review.
I thank you, too, Hanada-san. I was assigned to review this patch, but you beat
me to it. So now I'll do the follow-up review.
> I cleaned patch and merged your documentation patch
>
> I hope, this is all - a l
Hello
thank you very much for review.
I cleaned patch and merged your documentation patch
I hope, this is all - a language correction should do some native speaker
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2011/7/6 Shigeru Hanada :
> (2011/06/02 17:39), Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> This patch enhances a GET DIAGNOSTI
(2011/06/02 17:39), Pavel Stehule wrote:
> This patch enhances a GET DIAGNOSTICS statement functionality. It adds
> a possibility of access to exception's data. These data are stored on
> stack when exception's handler is activated - and these data are
> access-able everywhere inside handler. It ha
Hello
This patch enhances a GET DIAGNOSTICS statement functionality. It adds
a possibility of access to exception's data. These data are stored on
stack when exception's handler is activated - and these data are
access-able everywhere inside handler. It has a different behave (the
content is immut
10 matches
Mail list logo
