On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > Should every relevant contrib extension get a version bump with a
> > transition file which is nothing but a list of "alter function blah
> > blah blah parallel safe" ?
>
> Yes,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Should every relevant contrib extension get a version bump with a
> transition file which is nothing but a list of "alter function blah
> blah blah parallel safe" ?
Yes, I think that's what we would need to do. It's a lot of work,
albeit most
On 15 April 2016 at 12:45, Jeff Janes wrote:
> I think there are a lot of extensions which create functions which
> could benefit from being declared parallel safe. But how does one go
> about doing that?
>
> create extension xml2;
> select xml_valid(filler),count(*) from pgbench_accounts group
I think there are a lot of extensions which create functions which
could benefit from being declared parallel safe. But how does one go
about doing that?
create extension xml2;
select xml_valid(filler),count(*) from pgbench_accounts group by 1;
Time: 3205.830 ms
alter function xml_valid (text)
