Robert Haas writes:
>> On 11/09/2011 11:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think you have a broken version of "make". ecpg/preproc/Makefile
>>> is perfectly clear that parser.o depends on preproc.h.
> Either make 3.82 is broken, or there's something about it's behavior
> we don't understand. We've ha
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 11:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>>
>>> We still seem to have some dependency issues with parallel builds. I
>>> just got this on a fresh F16 box against git tip, when running "make -j
>>> 3":
>>> cc
On 11/09/2011 11:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
We still seem to have some dependency issues with parallel builds. I
just got this on a fresh F16 box against git tip, when running "make -j 3":
ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-aft
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> We still seem to have some dependency issues with parallel builds. I
> just got this on a fresh F16 box against git tip, when running "make -j 3":
> ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels
> -Wm
We still seem to have some dependency issues with parallel builds. I
just got this on a fresh F16 box against git tip, when running "make -j 3":
ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-sec
