On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 19:13:47 +0530,
Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2003 at 8:42, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> If that was hash index, Tom suggested to bump version number of the indexes in
> later versions and throw an error and ask user to reindex that particular
On 8 Sep 2003 at 8:42, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 15:25:12 +0200,
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's what I thought. I remember from the 7.3 beta-period that it broke
> > between beta2 and beta3 or so and am wondering if the developers are aw
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 15:25:12 +0200,
Andreas Joseph Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's what I thought. I remember from the 7.3 beta-period that it broke
> between beta2 and beta3 or so and am wondering if the developers are aware of
> any known issues which might require an initdb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 September 2003 15:27, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 14:45:41 +0200,
>
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Will there be any more on-disk format changes before 7.4 goes final which
> > will require a d
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 14:45:41 +0200,
Andreas Joseph Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Will there be any more on-disk format changes before 7.4 goes final which will
> require a dump-restore, or is that impossible to say?
While it is impossible to say with 100% certainly, the developers g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Will there be any more on-disk format changes before 7.4 goes final which will
require a dump-restore, or is that impossible to say?
- --
Andreas Joseph Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Managing Director, Senior Software Developer
OfficeNet AS
- - Th
