ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # CREATE TABLE test1 (i int) WITH (oids=0);
> CREATE TABLE
> # CREATE TABLE test2 (i int) WITH (oids=false);
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "false"
> LINE 1: CREATE TABLE test2 (i int) WITH (oids=false);
>
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose that we change the syntax to be
>
> WITH OIDS
> | WITHOUT OIDS
> | WITH (definition)
> | /*EMPTY*/
>
> and say that if you want to specify both OIDS and another option you
> have to write "oids" or "oids=false" in the defini
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 12:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I propose that we change the syntax to be
>
> WITH OIDS
> | WITHOUT OIDS
> | WITH (definition)
> | /*EMPTY*/
>
> and say that if you want to specify both OIDS and another option you
> have to write "oids" or "oids=false
Tom Lane wrote:
> The latter seems seriously grotty: it forces the user to remember an
Agreed.
> I propose that we change the syntax to be
>
> WITH OIDS
> | WITHOUT OIDS
> | WITH (definition)
> | /*EMPTY*/
>
> and say that if you want to specify both OIDS and another opt
I see that the just-applied fillfactor patch has changed the syntax
for CREATE TABLE to replace
OptWithOids:
WITH OIDS{ $$ = MUST_HAVE_OIDS; }
| WITHOUT OIDS { $$ = MUST_NOT_HAVE_OIDS; }
| /*EMPTY*/
