Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
. using "wb" for writing out on Windows is so that we don't
get Windows' gratuitous addition of carriage returns. I will document that.
Please use the #define PG_BINARY_W from c.h which is defined
with the correct letters for all platforms ("wb" on Windows).
> . using "wb" for writing out on Windows is so that we don't
> get Windows' gratuitous addition of carriage returns. I will document that.
Please use the #define PG_BINARY_W from c.h which is defined
with the correct letters for all platforms ("wb" on Windows).
That is how Peter's comment was
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Thanks. I will attend to most of this. A couple of points:
>
> . using "wb" for writing out on Windows is so that we don't get Windows'
> gratuitous addition of carriage returns. I will document that.
> . I can't use do { stuff; } while(0) for a macro that does declarat
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't pg_indent do the spacing for us when code is merged?
For the most part it will. You can ask Bruce to run the code through it
for you if you don't have BSD indent handy.
regards, tom lane
---(end
Thanks. I will attend to most of this. A couple of points:
. using "wb" for writing out on Windows is so that we don't get Windows'
gratuitous addition of carriage returns. I will document that.
. I can't use do { stuff; } while(0) for a macro that does declarations
- the declarations would be l
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> New version has passed basic Windows tests, and is available (with new
> Makefile too) at http://www.dunslane.net/~andrew/Initdb_In_C.html
>
> constructive comments (very) welcome.
That looks very nice. Just some nitpicking comments. (Most of these
comments should be ex
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, but when I asked that question at least one voice piped up (Debian
> package maintainer, I think) to say that these were still needed as
> standalone programs. However, I have already replaced the calls I
> previously
