On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> Another question: do we want to commit the code for creating
> unflattened hierarchy separately or along with partition-wise join?
Probably separately. I suggest posting a series of two (or perhaps
more) patches on the same thread. 'git
Another question: do we want to commit the code for creating
unflattened hierarchy separately or along with partition-wise join?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> w
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>> Given the scenario described above, it looks like we have to retain
>> partition hierarchy in the form of inheritance hierarchy in order to
>> implement partition-wise joins for mul
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> Given the scenario described above, it looks like we have to retain
> partition hierarchy in the form of inheritance hierarchy in order to
> implement partition-wise joins for multi-leveled partition tables. Is
> that the right thing to do?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>> I am starting this as a separate thread for this since the declarative
>> partitioning thread has many issues reported and it's better to keep
>> this discussion separate from the is
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> I am starting this as a separate thread for this since the declarative
> partitioning thread has many issues reported and it's better to keep
> this discussion separate from the issues reported on that thread.
>
> While expanding inheritance
Hi,
I am starting this as a separate thread for this since the declarative
partitioning thread has many issues reported and it's better to keep
this discussion separate from the issues reported on that thread.
While expanding inheritance, any inheritance hierarchy is flattened
out including partit
