Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-10-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
So those URL's are all fixed? Would you post your remaining failures? --- Reini Urban wrote: > Bruce Momjian schrieb: > > Great, just glad we could get it all working. ... > > Just that regression suite stopped working a w

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-10-13 Thread Reini Urban
Bruce Momjian schrieb: Great, just glad we could get it all working. ... Just that regression suite stopped working a while ago :( That's by far more serious than the tiny build patches. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00252.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-10-13 Thread Reini Urban
Bruce Momjian schrieb: I have added the attached patch to allow Cygwin /contrib compiles. I am a little confused why Cygwin requires -lpgport and no other platform does, but it is in the Cygwin-specific section so we can always improve it later if we find the cause. thanks. duplicate does not harm

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-10-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added the attached patch to allow Cygwin /contrib compiles. I am a little confused why Cygwin requires -lpgport and no other platform does, but it is in the Cygwin-specific section so we can always improve it later if we find the cause. Thanks. ---

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-10-09 Thread Reini Urban
Tom Lane schrieb: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Reini Urban wrote: Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is it still necessary support the cygwin ? FYI: If you drop it I will still provide cygwin packages. I just need it for testing and writing applications targetted to unix. With win

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Reini Urban wrote: >>> Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is it still necessary support the >>> cygwin ? >> >> FYI: If you drop it I will still provide cygwin packages. I just need it >> for testing and writing applications targetted to unix. With w

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Reini Urban wrote: > Gaetano Mendola schrieb: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would > >> you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and > >> the rest of the system builds OK? > > > > Now that postgres 8.0 is

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Reini Urban
Gaetano Mendola schrieb: Bruce Momjian wrote: I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and the rest of the system builds OK? Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is it still necessary support the c

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-08 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Bruce Momjian wrote: I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and the rest of the system builds OK? Now that postgres 8.0 is win32 native is it still necessary support the cygwin ? Regards Gaetano M

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-10-07 Thread Reini Urban
Bruce Momjian schrieb: Reini Urban wrote: Bruce Momjian schrieb: I have applied all parts of your patch now. Thanks. Core builds and works fine now. (plperl IPC problems aside) But there's are still some more minor SHLIB glitches, which only affects contrib, because -lpgport is missing for various

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-10-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Reini Urban wrote: > Bruce Momjian schrieb: > > I have applied all parts of your patch now. > > Thanks. Core builds and works fine now. (plperl IPC problems aside) > > But there's are still some more minor SHLIB glitches, > which only affects contrib, because -lpgport is missing for various dll's

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-10-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
I just made some major Win32 modifications in the past few days. Would you try Cygwin compile and see if the following warnings are removed and the rest of the system builds OK? --- Reini Urban wrote: > [BTW: there's no nee

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-11 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane Sent: Fri 9/10/2004 10:20 PM To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Reini Urban; PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL Win32 port list Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN > We don't --- apparently the win

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On the /contrib issue, I am not sure we even have Mingw compiling > > contrib. What error are you seeing? If I try to compile > > /contrib/dbsize under Unix I don't see any -lpgport line in the > > compile: > > It doesn't need any. It's loaded i

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian wrote: > On the /contrib issue, I am not sure we even have Mingw compiling > contrib. What error are you seeing? If I try to compile > /contrib/dbsize under Unix I don't see any -lpgport line in the > compile: It doesn't need any. It's loaded in the backend, which already has libp

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On the /contrib issue, I am not sure we even have Mingw compiling contrib. We don't --- apparently the win32 crowd hadn't bothered to try it until recently. There are a couple of patches in the queue that claim to make individual modules work, but I dun

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Well, glad we are on to real Cygwin issues at least. I know I had probably broken Cygwin with all the Win32 changes. I actually thought it would be worse. Glad you were able to help us. On the /contrib issue, I am not sure we even have Mingw compiling contrib. What error are you seeing? If I

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-10 Thread Reini Urban
Bruce Momjian schrieb: I have applied all parts of your patch now. Thanks. Core builds and works fine now. (plperl IPC problems aside) But there's are still some more minor SHLIB glitches, which only affects contrib, because -lpgport is missing for various dll's. SHLIB_LINK doesn't contain the libs

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have applied all parts of your patch now. --- Reini Urban wrote: > Reini Urban schrieb: > > [BTW: there's no need to cc all, I'm subscribed to most lists] > > Reini Urban schrieb: > >> Bruce Momjian schrieb: > >>> Andrew D

Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN

2004-09-10 Thread Reini Urban
Reini Urban schrieb: [BTW: there's no need to cc all, I'm subscribed to most lists] Reini Urban schrieb: Bruce Momjian schrieb: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Reini Urban wrote: FYI: WIN32 is also defined because is included. (/usr/incluse/w32api/windef.h) If you want this or that, do proper nesting, and

[HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN (was: APR 1.0 released)

2004-09-10 Thread Reini Urban
[BTW: there's no need to cc all, I'm subscribed to most lists] Reini Urban schrieb: Bruce Momjian schrieb: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Reini Urban wrote: FYI: WIN32 is also defined because is included. (/usr/incluse/w32api/windef.h) If you want this or that, do proper nesting, and use #else. Ugh, yes.