Re: [HACKERS] missing schema qualifications in psql

2010-04-01 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> While psql is careful to schema-qualify all references to built-in >> objects (pg_catalog.*), it completely neglects to do this for built-in >> operators, > > That's intentional because of the utter lack of readability

Re: [HACKERS] missing schema qualifications in psql

2010-04-01 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > While psql is careful to schema-qualify all references to built-in > objects (pg_catalog.*), it completely neglects to do this for built-in > operators, That's intentional because of the utter lack of readability that results if you try to use OPERATOR() everywhere ...

Re: [HACKERS] missing schema qualifications in psql

2010-04-01 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 > While psql is careful to schema-qualify all references to built-in > objects (pg_catalog.*), it completely neglects to do this for built-in > operators, which can lead to surprising misbehaviors when users have > created custom operators. Her