Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin
> installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing. If
> nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platform
> changes account for the regression.
Sound
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, it seems at least to be running. When I fire up postmaster there
> are 4 processes running and no indication of failure that I could see on
> the log. (There is a complaint about failing to dup(0) after 3195
> successes - I assume that has nothi
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Windows has ordering failures on the join and rules tests - Cygwin has a
> failures on the stats test. See buildfarm for details.
The ordering failures seem to be because the recent planner hacking has
taken us back to preferring merge joins for these
I have seen some small regression failures on REL8_0_STABLE - I thought
as we're coming up to a release I'd better run the stable branch through
on my buildfarm clients.
Windows has ordering failures on the join and rules tests - Cygwin has a
failures on the stats test. See buildfarm for detail
