Re: [HACKERS] management of large patches

2011-01-03 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Robert Haas writes: > - extensions - may need 2 or more commits I'm now basically done with coding, I'm writing the docs for the upgrade patch and preparing the upgrade SQL files for pre-9.1 to 9.1 upgrades of the contrib modules. Doing that, I've been cleaning up or reorganising some code: I wi

Re: [HACKERS] management of large patches

2011-01-03 Thread Greg Smith
Robert Haas wrote: - MERGE - checkpoint improvements As far as these two go, the state of MERGE is still rougher than I would like. The code itself isn't too hard to read, and that the errors that are popping up tend to be caught by assertions (rather than just being mysterious crashes)

Re: [HACKERS] management of large patches

2011-01-02 Thread Kevin Grittner
Robert Haas wrote: > - true serializability - not entirely sure of the status of this I try to keep the status section of the Wiki page up-to-date. I have just reviewed it and tweaked it for the latest events: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Serializable#Current_Status There are a number

Re: [HACKERS] management of large patches

2011-01-02 Thread KaiGai Kohei
(2011/01/02 14:32), Robert Haas wrote: We're coming the end of the 9.1 development cycle, and I think that there is a serious danger of insufficient bandwidth to handle the large patches we have outstanding. For my part, I am hoping to find the bandwidth to two, MAYBE three major commits between

Re: [HACKERS] management of large patches

2011-01-02 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > As for priority between those that *were* submitted earlier, and have > been reworked (which is how the system is supposed to work), it's a > lot harder. And TBH, I think we're going to have a problem getting all > those done. But the questi

Re: [HACKERS] management of large patches

2011-01-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 06:32, Robert Haas wrote: > We're coming the end of the 9.1 development cycle, and I think that > there is a serious danger of insufficient bandwidth to handle the > large patches we have outstanding.  For my part, I am hoping to find > the bandwidth to two, MAYBE three majo

[HACKERS] management of large patches

2011-01-01 Thread Robert Haas
We're coming the end of the 9.1 development cycle, and I think that there is a serious danger of insufficient bandwidth to handle the large patches we have outstanding. For my part, I am hoping to find the bandwidth to two, MAYBE three major commits between now and the end of 9.1CF4, but I am not