On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Argh, looks like I forgot the actual code changes required.
> I just noticed that pg_controldata and pg_resetxlog don't check for extra
> arguments:
> $ pg_resetxlog data fds sdf sdf
> Transaction log reset
I think that it would be good
On 10/24/2014 11:36 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
On 09/24/2014 05:48 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
Updated patches attached.
Thanks, applied some version of these.
This set of patches has been applied as
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 05:48 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>
>> Updated patches attached.
>>
>
> Thanks, applied some version of these.
>
This set of patches has been applied as b0d81ad but patch 0001 did not make
it in
On 09/24/2014 05:48 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
Updated patches attached.
Thanks, applied some version of these.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Updated patches attached.
-- Abhijit
>From b3bd465357f96ebf1953b3a98f25fb51bac5eb26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:26:00 +0530
Subject: Make pg_controldata ignore a -D before DataDir
---
doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_controldata.sgml| 5 +++--
src/bin/pg_c
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> P.S. Trivia: I can't find any other options in Postgres where the
> argument is mandatory but the option is optional.
psql behaves similarly with its -d and -U switches also; note --help:
Usage:
psql [OPTION]... [DBNAME [USERNAME]]
...
-d, --dbname=DBNAME data
On 09/24/2014 04:49 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2014-09-24 09:25:12 -0400, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What's so hard about [ -D ] before the datadir argument?
I'm sorry to have given you the impression that I objected to it because
it was hard. Since I proposed the same thing a few lines a
At 2014-09-24 09:25:12 -0400, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>
> What's so hard about [ -D ] before the datadir argument?
I'm sorry to have given you the impression that I objected to it because
it was hard. Since I proposed the same thing a few lines after what you
quoted, I guess I have to agree it's
Abhijit Menon-Sen writes:
> At 2014-09-24 16:02:29 +0300, hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
>> Thanks. Please update the docs and usage(), too.
> I'm sorry, but I don't think it would be an improvement to make the docs
> explain that it's valid to use either "-D datadir" or specify it without
> an o
To put it another way, I doubt any of the people who were surprised by
it looked at either the usage message or the docs. ;-)
-- Abhijit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
At 2014-09-24 16:02:29 +0300, hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
>
> Thanks. Please update the docs and usage(), too.
I'm sorry, but I don't think it would be an improvement to make the docs
explain that it's valid to use either "-D datadir" or specify it without
an option. If both commands were chang
On 09/24/2014 02:21 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2014-09-24 14:03:41 +0300, hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Ah, I frequently run into that too; but with pg_resetxlog.
Well, that's no fun. Patch attached.
Thanks. Please update the docs and usage(), too.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hacke
On 24 September 2014 12:04, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
> > than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
> > patch to make it work
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
> > than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
> > patch to make it work either way. As far as I can
On 24 September 2014 17:15, Michael Paquier Wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
> wrote:
> > I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
> > than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
> > patch to make it work either way.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
> than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
> patch to make it work either way. As far as I can see, it doesn't
> break anything, not even if y
At 2014-09-24 14:03:41 +0300, hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
>
> Ah, I frequently run into that too; but with pg_resetxlog.
Well, that's no fun. Patch attached.
-- Abhijit
>From 23fc4d90d0353e1c6d65ca5715fc0338199f01cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:48
On 09/24/2014 01:59 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
Hi.
I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
patch to make it work either way. As far as I can see, it doesn't
break anything, not even if you have a d
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
> than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
> patch to make it work either way. As far as I can see, it doesn't
> break anything, not
Hi.
I can never remember that pg_controldata takes only a dirname rather
than "-D dirname", and I gather I'm not the only one. Here's a tiny
patch to make it work either way. As far as I can see, it doesn't
break anything, not even if you have a data directory named "-D".
-- Abhijit
>From 15d43a3
20 matches
Mail list logo