Re: [HACKERS] libpq protocol version 2
"Chuck McDevitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is protocol version 2 still used by anything? Is there a reason why > this is still supported? Even if you're not concerned about breaking old clients, I believe that the JDBC folk are still giving out advice to use ProtocolVersion=2 as a workaround
[HACKERS] libpq protocol version 2
Is protocol version 2 still used by anything? Is there a reason why this is still supported? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org