Excerpts from Alex's message of jue abr 19 17:06:05 -0300 2012:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>
> > On tor, 2012-04-19 at 00:13 +0300, Alex wrote:
> >> +#!/usr/bin/env perl
> >
> > Don't do that. Call the script using $(PERL) from the makefile.
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. Attached v2 does
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tor, 2012-04-19 at 00:13 +0300, Alex wrote:
>> +#!/usr/bin/env perl
>
> Don't do that. Call the script using $(PERL) from the makefile.
Thank you for the suggestion. Attached v2 does just this (while keeping
a more commonly found shebang line in the perl script fo
On tor, 2012-04-19 at 00:13 +0300, Alex wrote:
> +#!/usr/bin/env perl
Don't do that. Call the script using $(PERL) from the makefile.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>> That's one reason for that, but there are probably others in the way of
>>> making this fully portable and automatable.
>
> This test setup also appears to labor under the illusion that we live
> in a Unix-only world. And for no good reason that I can tell. The
> shell
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as
>> possible? I know the buildfarm does not run "installcheck-world", so if
>> we want it there, it'd need a bit more code on the client side
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar abr 17 16:03:50 -0300 2012:
> >> That's one reason for that, but there are probably others in the way of
> >> making this fully portable and automatable.
>
> This test setup also appears to labor under the illusion that we live in
> a Unix-only worl
On 04/17/2012 02:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar abr 17 15:41:04 -0300 2012:
On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as
possible? I know the buildfarm does not run "
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar abr 17 15:41:04 -0300 2012:
> On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as
> > possible? I know the buildfarm does not run "installcheck-world", so if
> > we want it
On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as
> possible? I know the buildfarm does not run "installcheck-world", so if
> we want it there, it'd need a bit more code on the client side. I think
> it would be wise to
Hi,
When I committed Alex Shulgin's patch to add URI support to libpq, I
included the test harness as well. However, due to it being in a
separate subdirectory that did not previously had tests, it's not being
run by buildfarm.
It's not considered in "make installcheck-world" either.
What's
10 matches
Mail list logo