Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am also attaching a few more of Leslie's changes that I think are
> > useful. ?The first clarifies a confusion Leslie had about the fact that
> > "return" is referencing the return value of the function and not the
>
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am also attaching a few more of Leslie's changes that I think are
> useful. The first clarifies a confusion Leslie had about the fact that
> "return" is referencing the return value of the function and not the
> value returned in the point
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK, that last part seems kind of vague. ?;-) ?Can you hack up the diff
> >> to have just the changes you think are worthwhile? ?You can just remove
> >> the parts of the diff you don't like.
> >
> > Robert, here is a u
On ons, 2011-01-12 at 12:04 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> >
> > Leslie found a number of places o
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, that last part seems kind of vague. ;-) Can you hack up the diff
>> to have just the changes you think are worthwhile? You can just remove
>> the parts of the diff you don't like.
>
> Robert, here is a unified diff, which I think it e
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> > >
> > > Leslie found a number of places our
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> >
> > Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were un
2011/1/12 Robert Haas
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> >
> > Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that we
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
>
> Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were unclear
> or awkward, and this
The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were unclear
or awkward, and this diff generated by me attempts to address them.
I have already up
Yep, let's create the project.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > I knew that was coming. Some have been concerned that though Edmund
> > said OK, there is some new person wh
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I knew that was coming. Some have been concerned that though Edmund
> said OK, there is some new person who is the maintainer, though you
> would think Edmund would be the final word on that.
>
> Anyway, I will do it now, or as soon as I empty the pa
I knew that was coming. Some have been concerned that though Edmund
said OK, there is some new person who is the maintainer, though you
would think Edmund would be the final word on that.
Anyway, I will do it now, or as soon as I empty the patch queue.
'K, wanna do DBD::Pg next? :)
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Done.
>
> ---
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I will remove it from our cvs and move it over, and clean up our SGML to
> > compile properly. I ca
Done.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I will remove it from our cvs and move it over, and clean up our SGML to
> compile properly. I can do that much.
>
>
I will remove it from our cvs and move it over, and clean up our SGML to
compile properly. I can do that much.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > I can remove it cleanly, but
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I can remove it cleanly, but I have no idea how to add the SGML in a way
> that will allow it to build.
Anyone with some time on their hands that knows SGML enough to do this? :)
For now, can you extract what is required and commit it to the project
I can remove it cleanly, but I have no idea how to add the SGML in a way
that will allow it to build.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> That's one thing that I can't touch, since I have no idea about SGML :(
>
> Bruce, can
That's one thing that I can't touch, since I have no idea about SGML :(
Bruce, can you extract that and add it to the CVS repository for libpq++?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscr
19 matches
Mail list logo
