Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-09 Thread Florian Weimer
* David Fetter: > What is it about a GPLed psql client that is a non-starter for the > installer? I'm not a fan of the GPL, but in this case, the effects of > linking it in are quite limited in scope, i.e. they pertain to exactly > one binary. And the usual showstopper, OpenSSL, might well fall

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:38:30PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Monday, August 1, 2011, David Fetter wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Fetter wrote: > >> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > >

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
David Fetter writes: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> The scope or number of files is irrelevant. Having just a single >> GPL'd file in those installers makes it impossible for ISVs to >> bundle them with their products, unless they open source them under >> a GPL co

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 08/01/2011 04:23 PM, David Fetter wrote: The scope or number of files is irrelevant. Having just a single GPL'd file in those installers makes it impossible for ISVs to bundle them with their products, unless they open source them under a GPL compatible licence. I know of no one, not even

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread Dave Page
On Monday, August 1, 2011, David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Fetter wrote: >> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> > I thin

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Fetter wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline in

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 08/01/2011 02:17 PM, Dave Page wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Fetter wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into installer builds for Lion.

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread Dave Page
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Fetter wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into >> > installer builds for Lion. >> >> Unfortunately the licence

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-08-01 Thread David Fetter
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into > > installer builds for Lion. > > Unfortunately the licence makes that a non-starter. What is it about a GPLed psql cl

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-31 Thread Dave Page
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Dave Page's message of sáb jul 30 15:32:03 -0400 2011: >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into installer >> > builds for Lion. >> >> Unfortunately

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-31 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Dave Page's message of sáb jul 30 15:32:03 -0400 2011: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into installer > > builds for Lion. > > Unfortunately the licence makes that a non-starter. A fixed version of lib

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-30 Thread Dave Page
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into installer > builds for Lion. Unfortunately the licence makes that a non-starter. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enter

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
[ ... having now installed OS X Lion ... ] Dave Page writes: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> and if so does it crash when you try >> to tab-complete a case with exactly 9 completions? > Tab complete doesn't seem to work at all (nor does it in my builds > with libedit). No

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-25 Thread Jim Nasby
On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On 22 July 2011 03:24, Tom Lane wrote: >> I had a bug filed with Apple about that, and today I got some auto-mail >> indicating they'd fixed that bug as of OS X 10.7 (Lion). I don't have >> Lion installed here, but I grabbed the libedit sourc

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-22 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Page writes: >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan >> wrote: >>> On 22 July 2011 03:24, Tom Lane wrote: >> I had a bug filed with Apple about that, and today I got some auto-mail >> indicating they'd fixed that bug as of OS

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page writes: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan > wrote: >> On 22 July 2011 03:24, Tom Lane wrote: > I had a bug filed with Apple about that, and today I got some auto-mail > indicating they'd fixed that bug as of OS X 10.7 (Lion).  I don't have > Lion installed here, but I

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-22 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On 22 July 2011 03:24, Tom Lane wrote: >> I had a bug filed with Apple about that, and today I got some auto-mail >> indicating they'd fixed that bug as of OS X 10.7 (Lion).  I don't have >> Lion installed here, but I grabbed the libedit s

Re: [HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-22 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 22 July 2011 03:24, Tom Lane wrote: > I had a bug filed with Apple about that, and today I got some auto-mail > indicating they'd fixed that bug as of OS X 10.7 (Lion).  I don't have > Lion installed here, but I grabbed the libedit sources from > www.opensource.apple.com and indeed it looks fix

[HACKERS] libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion

2011-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
We've had several complaints about that tab-completion bug in the Apple-supplied version of libedit, most recently here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-06/msg00119.php I had a bug filed with Apple about that, and today I got some auto-mail indicating they'd fixed that bug as of OS