Andrew Dunstan writes:
> Are we trying to store these up or just applying them as they go?
No, just do it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/p
On 07/15/2014 11:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we need to fix this
for 9.4. It will mean a catalog bump :-(
Agreed.
Are we trying to store these up or just applying them as they go?
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to y
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> I have just noticed that I inadvertently marked the json_build*
> functions as immutable. That seems to be a plain error, as, for example,
> timestamptz output will not be immutable.
Ah, yes, our convention is that anything depending on datatype I/O
functions is to be m
I have just noticed that I inadvertently marked the json_build*
functions as immutable. That seems to be a plain error, as, for example,
timestamptz output will not be immutable. I think we need to fix this
for 9.4. It will mean a catalog bump :-(
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mai
