Re: [HACKERS] iso-8859-15/16 to MULE

2001-10-11 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> > Well, the conversion to/from UTF-8 for ISO 8859-10 or later is pretty > > easy and should be supported, I think. Actually I already have > > generated mapping tables for these charsets. I will make patches > > against current and leave it for the core's decision, whether it > > should be inclu

Re: [HACKERS] iso-8859-15/16 to MULE

2001-10-10 Thread Tom Lane
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, the conversion to/from UTF-8 for ISO 8859-10 or later is pretty > easy and should be supported, I think. Actually I already have > generated mapping tables for these charsets. I will make patches > against current and leave it for the core's decisio

Re: [HACKERS] iso-8859-15/16 to MULE

2001-10-10 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> e.g. when I tried to use "recode", which does recognise iso-8859-15 > and 16, and convert to MULE, whatever I do, I obtain "EUR" for the > euro sign, OE, oe, s, S, z, Z, "Y for the different characters which > are specific to 15 for example, and that's even worse for 16. Apparently MULE curren

[HACKERS] iso-8859-15/16 to MULE

2001-10-10 Thread Patrice Hédé
I've been looking a bit at the MULE encoding wrt to latin 9 and 10. It seems that there is no support for the Euro at all in it. e.g. when I tried to use "recode", which does recognise iso-8859-15 and 16, and convert to MULE, whatever I do, I obtain "EUR" for the euro sign, OE, oe, s, S, z, Z, "Y