On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:52:12PM -0500, Brian Hurt wrote:
> Joachim Wieland wrote:
> >Yes, I completely agree that JDT should not be included. I just wanted to
> >understand how those lines show that JST is still in active use. As far as
> >I
> >understand it, it says that JST was observed from
Joachim Wieland wrote:
Yes, I completely agree that JDT should not be included. I just wanted to
understand how those lines show that JST is still in active use. As far as I
understand it, it says that JST was observed from 1948 to 1951 (the second
rule) and now there is a time zone "J%sT" (beca
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 10:26:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joachim Wieland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > True... Actually I wonder how I have to read the zic files in this case.
> > It says:
> > RuleJapan 1948only- May Sun>=1 2:001:00
> > D
> > RuleJ
Joachim Wieland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> True... Actually I wonder how I have to read the zic files in this case.
> It says:
> Rule Japan 1948only- May Sun>=1 2:001:00D
> Rule Japan 19481951- Sep Sat>=8 2:000 S
> Rule Japan 1949
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:37:56AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joachim Wieland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Appended is a patch that adds JST and JDT into Asia.txt and the Default set.
> Um ... is there a JDT? Last I heard, Japan does not observe daylight
> time. I don't see a JDT in the old PG
Joachim Wieland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Appended is a patch that adds JST and JDT into Asia.txt and the Default set.
Um ... is there a JDT? Last I heard, Japan does not observe daylight
time. I don't see a JDT in the old PG set of recognized zone names, and
I'd think we'd have heard compla
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:17:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> However, I encounter the problem of timestamp.:-(
> >> Was anyone recognizing this problem?
> > The list of accepted timezones is now configurable, check through the
> > docs how to find the list and set it the way you want.
> Yeah, b
"Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> I was doing the field test of Slony-I 1.2.2 release now.
> However, I encounter the problem of timestamp.:-(
> Was anyone recognizing this problem?
>
> Ver 8.1.5
> saito=# select 'Fri Dec 15 14:26:05.502000 2006 JST'::timestamp;
>timesta
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:48:50PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>>> I was doing the field test of Slony-I 1.2.2 release now.
>>> However, I encounter the problem of timestamp.:-(
>>> Was anyone recognizing this problem?
>
>> T
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:48:50PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>> I was doing the field test of Slony-I 1.2.2 release now.
>> However, I encounter the problem of timestamp.:-(
>> Was anyone recognizing this problem?
> The list of accepted timezones is now configur
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:20:22PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Thanks.
> I do not think that this is normal.
>
> As for 8.2..
> SELECT timeofday()::timestamp;
> ERROR: invalid input syntax for type timestamp: "Fri Dec 15
> 14:26:05.502000 2006 JST"
Err, sounds like a bug to me. Good ahead
- Original Message -
From: "Martijn van Oosterhout"
I was doing the field test of Slony-I 1.2.2 release now.
However, I encounter the problem of timestamp.:-(
Was anyone recognizing this problem?
The list of accepted timezones is now configurable, check through the
docs how to find the
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:48:50PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was doing the field test of Slony-I 1.2.2 release now.
> However, I encounter the problem of timestamp.:-(
> Was anyone recognizing this problem?
The list of accepted timezones is now configurable, check through the
docs h
Hi.
I was doing the field test of Slony-I 1.2.2 release now.
However, I encounter the problem of timestamp.:-(
Was anyone recognizing this problem?
Ver 8.1.5
saito=# select 'Fri Dec 15 14:26:05.502000 2006 JST'::timestamp;
timestamp
-
2006-12-15 14:26:05.502
Ver 8
14 matches
Mail list logo
