Not sure if this is useful - I just found it on MSDN. It talks about porting
issues, including specifically signal handling techniques (it seems to
recommend using windows messaging instead of signals for some scenarios).. I
am not sure how easy it would be to abstract this away by providing a
sig
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I assume then that the MinGW environment is missing signal emulation
> that is present in the Microsoft C runtime distribution? Microsoft's is
> copyrighted, of course in winsig.c (it is actually quite small, just a
> couple hundred lines of code). Are you prop
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] information Windows - PostgreSQL
Peer Directs relied on Visual C C++ code to handle it, and it didn't
look pretty. I am not sure how hard it is going to be to get that
working properly.
---(end of broadcast)---
ROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:03 AM
> To: P.M
> Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] information Windows - PostgreSQL
>
>
> Not sure. We are petty deep in the backend code allowing CreateProcess
> and then we need
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:03 AM
To: P.M
Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] information Windows - PostgreSQL
Not sure. We are petty deep in the backend code allowing CreateProcess
and then we need to add signal handling. We don't have anything r
Not sure. We are petty deep in the backend code allowing CreateProcess
and then we need to add signal handling. We don't have anything running
yet.
---
P.M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to participate to PostgreSQL under
Hi,
I would like to participate to PostgreSQL under
Windows platform.
What can i do to help ?
x04001
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9