'pgsql-hackers ' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] index support for arrays (GiST)
>
> > It looks like other people just didn't use index decompression function
> > (at least in Gene's code decompression function just do return ) and
> >
> It looks like other people just didn't use index decompression function
> (at least in Gene's code decompression function just do return ) and
> that's why this bug was not discovered. We could make a patch for
> upcoming 7.1 if hackers desired. I consider this patch as a bugfix
> not a new fea
> Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> 'pgsql-hackers ' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [HACKERS] index support for arrays (GiST)
>
> Hi,
>
> we are getting a bit close to add index support for int arrays using
> GiST interface. T
Hi,
we are getting a bit close to add index support for int arrays using
GiST interface. This will really drive up performance of our full text
search fully based on postgresql. We have a problem with broken index
and couldn't find a reason. I attached archive with sources
for GiST functions and
