Re: [HACKERS] index sizes: single table vs partitioned
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote: > For a large table, should there be a difference in index sizes between a > single table representation and representation based on multiple partitions > with identical indexes? This isn't really the right mailing list for this question; this
[HACKERS] index sizes: single table vs partitioned
For a large table, should there be a difference in index sizes between a single table representation and representation based on multiple partitions with identical indexes? A