"Kevin Grittner" wrote:
> New version attached. Will apply if no further problems are found.
Pushed to master and REL9_2_STABLE.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hack
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
>> By not visiting the heap page for tuples, index-only scans fail to
>> acquire all of the necessary predicate locks for correct behavior
>> at the serializable transaction isolation level. The tag for the
>> tuple-level predicate locks includes the xmi
"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> By not visiting the heap page for tuples, index-only scans fail to
> acquire all of the necessary predicate locks for correct behavior at
> the serializable transaction isolation level. The tag for the
> tuple-level predicate locks includes the xmin, to avoid possible
>
By not visiting the heap page for tuples, index-only scans fail to
acquire all of the necessary predicate locks for correct behavior at
the serializable transaction isolation level. The tag for the
tuple-level predicate locks includes the xmin, to avoid possible
problems with tid re-use. (This wa
