On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-07-19 at 14:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think it would be less confusing to write the IP address as the main
>> piece of information, and put the hostname in parentheses only if we
>> accepted it as valid (i.e. we did bo
On tis, 2011-07-19 at 14:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think it would be less confusing to write the IP address as the main
> piece of information, and put the hostname in parentheses only if we
> accepted it as valid (i.e. we did both lookups, and everything
> matched).
>
> ERROR: no pg_hba.co
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Since we are accepting host names in pg_hba.conf now, I figured it could
> be useful to also show the host names in error message, e.g.,
>
> no pg_hba.conf entry for host "localhost" (127.0.0.1), user "x", database
> "y"
>
> Attached i
Since we are accepting host names in pg_hba.conf now, I figured it could
be useful to also show the host names in error message, e.g.,
no pg_hba.conf entry for host "localhost" (127.0.0.1), user "x", database
"y"
Attached is an example patch. The question might be what criterion to
use for
