On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> moa, which is claimed on the buildfarm dashboard to be using gcc but is
>>> actually using cc, hits the spinlock problem in 8.0 and 8.1 and the
>>> BYTE_ORDER problem in 8
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Also, although moa is actually green for 8.3, it's showing an initdb
failure in 8.4 and up ("cache lookup failed for type 0" while processing
system_views.sql)
Dave Page writes:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> moa, which is claimed on the buildfarm dashboard to be using gcc but is
>> actually using cc, hits the spinlock problem in 8.0 and 8.1 and the
>> BYTE_ORDER problem in 8.2.
> Per above, moa is configured with --disable-spinl
Dave Page writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Also, although moa is actually green for 8.3, it's showing an initdb
>>> failure in 8.4 and up ("cache lookup failed for type 0" while processing
>>> system_views.sql). I'm betting this is some sort of
>>> over-aggressive-
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, although moa is actually green for 8.3, it's showing an initdb
>> failure in 8.4 and up ("cache lookup failed for type 0" while processing
>> system_views.sql). I'm betting this is some
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The new buildfarm machines huia and moa aren't doing terribly well
> with the older PG branches. This isn't really those machines' fault;
> what I find after a bit of digging is that we just didn't have good
> support for 64-bit Solaris until rel
I wrote:
> what I find after a bit of digging is that we just didn't have good
> support for 64-bit Solaris until relatively recently. In particular:
BTW, just for the record: it's Solaris on 64-bit Intel that's at
issue. 64-bit Sparc support goes way back, as evidenced by the fact
that protosci
The new buildfarm machines huia and moa aren't doing terribly well
with the older PG branches. This isn't really those machines' fault;
what I find after a bit of digging is that we just didn't have good
support for 64-bit Solaris until relatively recently. In particular:
* There was no 64-bit s
