Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> How do people feel about changing matching for host and hostssl to be such that
> a plain host line in pg_hba.conf does not allow a SSL connection but requires
> the hostssl specifier?
>
> I had been going to submit a very small patch to do this but then it occurred
>
"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If your real gripe is that libpq insists on trying SSL connections
>> first, the server is the wrong end to be patching that problem at.
>> There should be a way to control libpq's allow_ssl_try state variable
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How do people feel about changing matching for host and hostssl to be such that
> > a plain host line in pg_hba.conf does not allow a SSL connection but requires
> > the hostssl specifier?
>
> Then there wou
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> How do people feel about changing matching for host and hostssl to be such that
> a plain host line in pg_hba.conf does not allow a SSL connection but requires
> the hostssl specifier?
Nigel,
We had discussed overhauling the connection settings on b
"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do people feel about changing matching for host and hostssl to be such that
> a plain host line in pg_hba.conf does not allow a SSL connection but requires
> the hostssl specifier?
Then there would be no way to have a host entry that allowed bot
How do people feel about changing matching for host and hostssl to be such that
a plain host line in pg_hba.conf does not allow a SSL connection but requires
the hostssl specifier?
I had been going to submit a very small patch to do this but then it occurred
to me this was a good candidate for a
