Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-27 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello 2012/11/27 Piyush Newe : > > Just another thought ! > > When we are setting up the variable using \gset, I feel their should be a > provision > to drop a particular variable. > > Internally, all the variables are set into "VariableSpace" linked-list. We > should provide > a command to Drop a

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-27 Thread Piyush Newe
Just another thought ! When we are setting up the variable using \gset, I feel their should be a provision to drop a particular variable. Internally, all the variables are set into "VariableSpace" linked-list. We should provide a command to Drop a particular variable, because in some cases unnece

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-19 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
"Karl O. Pinc" writes: > Yes. I'm wrong. For some reason I thought you could use DO to make > an anonymous code block that would act as a SETOF function, > allowing RETURN NEXT expr (et-al) to be used in the > plpgsql code, allowing DO to return table results. > (Or, perhaps, instead, be used in

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-19 Thread Pavel Stehule
2012/11/19 Karl O. Pinc : > On 11/19/2012 02:30:49 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> Hello >> >> 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : >> > Hi Pavel, >> > >> > On 11/16/2012 12:21:11 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : >> > >> >> > As long as I'm talking crazy talk, why not >> >> > abandon psql

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-19 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/19/2012 02:30:49 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : > > Hi Pavel, > > > > On 11/16/2012 12:21:11 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : > > > >> > As long as I'm talking crazy talk, why not > >> > abandon psql as a shell language and instead make

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-19 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : > Hi Pavel, > > On 11/16/2012 12:21:11 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : > >> > As long as I'm talking crazy talk, why not >> > abandon psql as a shell language and instead make a >> > pl/pgsql interpreter with readlne() in front >> > of it? So

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-16 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Hi Pavel, On 11/16/2012 12:21:11 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : > > As long as I'm talking crazy talk, why not > > abandon psql as a shell language and instead make a > > pl/pgsql interpreter with readlne() in front > > of it? Solve all these language-related > > issues by

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-15 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc : > On 11/03/2012 01:45:36 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> Hello >> >> here is a updated patch > > This message does not appear to be threaded so I'm not > sure I've read the whole back-history. Also, I don't > really know what I'm doing. Never the less, I want > to try

Re: [HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-15 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 11/03/2012 01:45:36 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > here is a updated patch This message does not appear to be threaded so I'm not sure I've read the whole back-history. Also, I don't really know what I'm doing. Never the less, I want to try to contribute to somebody else's patch so her

[HACKERS] gset updated patch

2012-11-05 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello here is a updated patch Regards Pavel gset_12.diff Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers