Re: [HACKERS] gin_fuzzy_search_limit and postgresql.conf.sample

2015-09-08 Thread Fujii Masao
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> I assume it's an oversight. It was originally added in > > Agree, it seems so So fixed. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http:/

Re: [HACKERS] gin_fuzzy_search_limit and postgresql.conf.sample

2015-09-08 Thread Teodor Sigaev
I assume it's an oversight. It was originally added in Agree, it seems so 8a3631f8d86cdd9b07c577d6e213b1fc824db255, the commit that originally added GIN. Documentation was added later that year in 0ca9907ce443c58532f1c09e716b7d9cad9039a5. Why would we intentionally document it but leave it o

Re: [HACKERS] gin_fuzzy_search_limit and postgresql.conf.sample

2015-09-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: > My client found that gin_fuzzy_search_limit is not included in > postgresql.conf.sample. Is this intentional? Or oversight? I assume it's an oversight. It was originally added in 8a3631f8d86cdd9b07c577d6e213b1fc824db255, the commit that origin

[HACKERS] gin_fuzzy_search_limit and postgresql.conf.sample

2015-09-04 Thread Fujii Masao
Hi, My client found that gin_fuzzy_search_limit is not included in postgresql.conf.sample. Is this intentional? Or oversight? Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref