On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jaime Casanova
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Robert Haas writes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jaime Casanova
> why not let it go in ANALYZE, just as the sort i
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jaime Casanova
why not let it go in ANALYZE, just as the sort info
>>
>>> It's kinda long-winded - it adds like 4 extra lines
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jaime Casanova
>>> why not let it go in ANALYZE, just as the sort info
>
>> It's kinda long-winded - it adds like 4 extra lines for each hash
>> join. I don't think I want to add that muc
Robert Haas writes:
> Care to suggest a format?
As much like the sort case as possible ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jaime Casanova
>>> why not let it go in ANALYZE, just as the sort info
>
>> It's kinda long-winded - it adds like 4 extra lines for each hash
>> join. I don't think I want to add that muc
Robert Haas writes:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jaime Casanova
>> why not let it go in ANALYZE, just as the sort info
> It's kinda long-winded - it adds like 4 extra lines for each hash
> join. I don't think I want to add that much clutter to regular E-A
> output.
Well, that would only
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jaime Casanova
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I was also thinking about the possibility of adding a new option
>> called "output" and making that control whether the "Output" line gets
>> printed. It's kind of annoying to use
isn't that line pretty much the main point of "verbose"? I would assume
anything new like this would get its own option which might default to on.
greg
On 24 Jan 2010 03:08, "Robert Haas" wrote:
Per recent discussion on pgsql-performance, and per discussion on
-hackers that it might not be too
Le 24/01/2010 06:06, Jaime Casanova a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I was also thinking about the possibility of adding a new option
>> called "output" and making that control whether the "Output" line gets
>> printed. It's kind of annoying to use EXPLAIN (A
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> I was also thinking about the possibility of adding a new option
> called "output" and making that control whether the "Output" line gets
> printed. It's kind of annoying to use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE)
why not let it go in ANALYZE, just
Per recent discussion on pgsql-performance, and per discussion on
-hackers that it might not be too late for small patches after all,
here is a patch (as yet without documentation) which adds some
additional instrumentation to EXPLAIN for hashes: number of buckets,
number of batches, original numbe
11 matches
Mail list logo
