On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Amit Langote
> wrote:
> > Yeah, I was thinking the same while writing the patch posted on the
> thread
> > "A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()" [1]. That patch
> > adds the break you menti
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> Yeah, I was thinking the same while writing the patch posted on the thread
> "A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()" [1]. That patch
> adds the break you mention in 2, but didn't do anything about point 1.
>
> In any case, +1
On 2017/06/13 18:08, Jeevan Ladhe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was doing some testing for my default partitioning work, and I realized
> that
> there seem to be a some optimization possible (and I think we should really
> have
> this optimization) for logic around handling the "key IS NOT NULL"
> constraint
Hi,
I was doing some testing for my default partitioning work, and I realized
that
there seem to be a some optimization possible (and I think we should really
have
this optimization) for logic around handling the "key IS NOT NULL"
constraints
followed by predicate_implied_by() call.
1. Consider,
