On 18 Říjen 2013, 17:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tomas Vondra" writes:
>> 2) Is there any particular reason why
>> PlanForeignModify/BeginForeignModify
>> require the fdw_private to be a List*, and not a generic pointer?
>
> That data has to be copiable by copyObject(), which a generic void* is
> not.
"Tomas Vondra" writes:
> 2) Is there any particular reason why PlanForeignModify/BeginForeignModify
> require the fdw_private to be a List*, and not a generic pointer?
That data has to be copiable by copyObject(), which a generic void* is
not. We could perhaps have made it Node* instead, but tha
Hi,
I've been exploring the new FDW API in the past few days, and I'm slightly
confused by the fdw_private fields. A few comments:
1) Generally all the API functions pass data using fields in the nodes
(e.g. GetForeignRelSize uses baserel->fdw_private etc.), but
PlanForeignModify simply returns t
