On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 21:26 +0700, Artem Yazkov wrote:
> Restrictions:
> 1. Uninterrupted supply of statistics collector necessary for
> efficient use of this algorithm.
In my understanding, we do not guarantee this. That leaves the rest of
your ideas drifting, I'm sorry to say. Your ide
Hi hackers,
I'm novice in PostgreSQL codebase (and in English too :-)), but I'd be
glad to make a modest contribution to this great project.
By viewing this list, I see a lot of discussions on the problem of
"fast count (*)", but acceptable decision have not been formulated.
Well, I make
Artem Yazkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By viewing this list, I see a lot of discussions on the problem of
> "fast count (*)", but acceptable decision have not been formulated.
> Well, I make bold to propose own view on the problem.
A number of the things you suggest would be good
Hi hackers,
I'm novice in PostgreSQL codebase (and in English too :-)), but I'd be
glad to make a modest contribution to this great project.
By viewing this list, I see a lot of discussions on the problem of
"fast count (*)", but acceptable decision have not been formulated.
Well, I make
