Re: [HACKERS] failed to compile a C++ SPI function

2000-10-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I am willing to change it to typname. Any comments? > > That's hardly the only change you will have to make to get the headers > to pass through a C++ compiler without complaint. How many existing > applications do you want to risk breaking? > >

Re: [HACKERS] failed to compile a C++ SPI function

2000-10-07 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am willing to change it to typname. Any comments? That's hardly the only change you will have to make to get the headers to pass through a C++ compiler without complaint. How many existing applications do you want to risk breaking? ParamNo probably

Re: [HACKERS] failed to compile a C++ SPI function

2000-10-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
I am willing to change it to typname. Any comments? > Just for fun I changed the extension of my SPI function and trigger > source file from .c to .C and tried to compile it: > > > g++ -g -Wall -I /usr/include/postgresql -fPIC -pedantic-c -o bid_control.o >bid_control.C > > In file include

[HACKERS] failed to compile a C++ SPI function

2000-10-01 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
Just for fun I changed the extension of my SPI function and trigger source file from .c to .C and tried to compile it: > g++ -g -Wall -I /usr/include/postgresql -fPIC -pedantic-c -o bid_control.o >bid_control.C > In file included from /usr/include/postgresql/nodes/relation.h:18, >