Hi Peter,
On Monday, October 08, 2012 09:43:51 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Pendantry: This should be in alphabetical order:
>
> ! OBJS = stringinfo.o ilist.o
Argh. Youve said that before. Somehow I reintroduced it...
> I notice that the patch (my revision) produces a whole bunch of
> warnings li
On Monday, October 01, 2012 05:33:01 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On Sunday, September 30, 2012 10:33:28 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm still pretty desperately unhappy with your insistence on circularly
> >> linked dlists. Not only does that make initialization problematic,
> >> bu
Andres Freund writes:
> On Sunday, September 30, 2012 10:33:28 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm still pretty desperately unhappy with your insistence on circularly
>> linked dlists. Not only does that make initialization problematic,
>> but now it's not even consistent with slists.
> We literally have t
On 9/30/12 5:42 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I thought msvc supported _Static_assert as well, but after a short search it
> seems I misremembered and it only supports static_assert from C++11 (which is
> plausible, because I've worked on a C++11 project which was ported to windows
> ). I don't kno
On Sunday, September 30, 2012 10:48:01 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > Perhaps we need to decouple _Static_assert support from compound
> > statement support at some point, but we will see.
>
> Yeah, possibly, but until we have an example of a non-gcc-compatible
> compiler that can
Hi,
On Sunday, September 30, 2012 10:33:28 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > Current version is available at branch ilist in:
> > git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/andresfreund/postgres.git
> > ssh://g...@git.postgresql.org/users/andresfreund/postgres.git
>
> I'm still pretty despe
Andres Freund writes:
> Perhaps we need to decouple _Static_assert support from compound statement
> support at some point, but we will see.
Yeah, possibly, but until we have an example of a non-gcc-compatible
compiler that can do something equivalent, it's hard to guess how we
might need to alt
On Sunday, September 30, 2012 06:57:32 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > Patch 0001 contains a assert_compatible_types(a, b) and a
> > assert_compatible_types_bool(a, b) macro which I found very useful to
> > make it harder to misuse the api. I think its generally useful and
> > possi
Andres Freund writes:
> Current version is available at branch ilist in:
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/andresfreund/postgres.git
> ssh://g...@git.postgresql.org/users/andresfreund/postgres.git
I'm still pretty desperately unhappy with your insistence on circularly
linked dlists. Not only
Andres Freund writes:
> Patch 0001 contains a assert_compatible_types(a, b) and a
> assert_compatible_types_bool(a, b) macro which I found very useful to make it
> harder to misuse the api. I think its generally useful and possibly should be
> used in more places.
This seems like basically a goo
> Add [ds]list's which can be used to embed lists in bigger data structures
> without additional memory management
> Alvaro, Andres, Review by Peter G. and Tom
This is missing Robert. Sorry for that.
Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Develop
11 matches
Mail list logo
