Re: [HACKERS] ecpg regression broken on mingw

2007-06-14 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:08:00PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > Maybe

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg regression broken on mingw

2007-06-14 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs > > > supp

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg regression broken on mingw

2007-06-14 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs > > supposed to be done ignoring whitespace? > > pg_init() in pg_regress_ecpg.c has:

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg regression broken on mingw

2007-06-14 Thread Joachim Wieland
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs > supposed to be done ignoring whitespace? pg_init() in pg_regress_ecpg.c has: /* no reason to set -w for ecpg checks, except for when on windows */

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg regression broken on mingw

2007-06-14 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:47:58AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem like it appears on cursory inspection. It certainly l

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg regression broken on mingw

2007-06-14 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:47:58AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm > trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem > like it appears on cursory inspection. It certainly looks like that, but yak is

[HACKERS] ecpg regression broken on mingw

2007-06-14 Thread Andrew Dunstan
The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem like it appears on cursory inspection. cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg regression broken

2006-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > We don;t have many buildfarm members testing ECPG yet, but at several > are broken. Not sure why yet. > > see > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=agouti&dt=2006-09-03%2002:15:01 > > for example It is the LIMIT/OFFSET patch changes to gram.y. I am loo

[HACKERS] ecpg regression broken

2006-09-02 Thread Andrew Dunstan
We don;t have many buildfarm members testing ECPG yet, but at several are broken. Not sure why yet. see http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=agouti&dt=2006-09-03%2002:15:01 for example cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP