Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We now have two very similar doubly-linked list implementations. Should
> we take one of them out?
If you're thinking of dllist, it has considerably different implementation
assumptions.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-ha
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Since we require every process to map the shared memory region to the same
> > address, we don't need the MAKE_PTR/OFFSET code that was needed when that
> > was not the case. This patch makes shared memory pointers just like
> > regula
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since we require every process to map the shared memory region to the same
> address, we don't need the MAKE_PTR/OFFSET code that was needed when that
> was not the case. This patch makes shared memory pointers just like
> regular pointers.
Applied with
Since we require every process to map the shared memory region to the same
address, we don't need the MAKE_PTR/OFFSET code that was needed when that
was not the case. This patch makes shared memory pointers just like
regular pointers.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-08/msg0
