Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-29 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:32 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Thanks for the reminder - done (installed the DEB from sid, version > > 1.78.1). > > > This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we > > (you? :P) can verify

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:32 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Thanks for the reminder - done (installed the DEB from sid, version > 1.78.1). > This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we > (you? :P) can verify after the next snapshots that it's correct? > After in-depth inspect

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: > > This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we (you? > :P) > > can verify after the next snapshots that it's correct? > > I thought the devel docs at > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/ >

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > This will somehow show up in the snapshot builds, correct? So we (you? :P) > can verify after the next snapshots that it's correct? I thought the devel docs at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/ were built on that machine? regards, tom

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 10/3/13, 7:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> Did we get around to doing this? > > Nope. > > > > Given my schedule between now and the release wrap, I won't have a > > chance to do it if I want any reasonable ability to roll it back if

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-11-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 10/3/13, 7:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Did we get around to doing this? > Nope. > > Given my schedule between now and the release wrap, I won't have a > chance to do it if I want any reasonable ability to roll it back if it > fails. But if you want to ahead and get it done, go ahead :) Ne

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-10-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> >> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-10-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut writes: > >> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>> Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that > >>> version. Any objections? > > > >> This was not done

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-08-22 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that >>> version. Any objections? > >> This was not done for 9.3rc1, AFAICT. Let's please do

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that >> version. Any objections? > This was not done for 9.3rc1, AFAICT. Let's please do it for the next > release builds. Um ... touching borka

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-08-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that > version. Any objections? This was not done for 9.3rc1, AFAICT. Let's please do it for the next release builds. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hacker

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-07-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 7/11/13 5:55 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> If it's safe to switch on the old ones as well, it sounds doable. If >> we need different toolchains, that's going to be a serious pain. Have >> you verified that it's fine with the old ones as

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-07-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 7/11/13 5:55 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > If it's safe to switch on the old ones as well, it sounds doable. If > we need different toolchains, that's going to be a serious pain. Have > you verified that it's fine with the old ones as well, or are you jsut > assuming? I tested it and it's fine.

Re: [HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-07-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I would like to start using a newer version of docbook-xsl for the > release builds. This is currently used for building the man pages. The > latest release is 1.78.1 and fixes a few formatting errors. > > How do we do that? > > We could

[HACKERS] docbook-xsl version for release builds

2013-07-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I would like to start using a newer version of docbook-xsl for the release builds. This is currently used for building the man pages. The latest release is 1.78.1 and fixes a few formatting errors. How do we do that? We could just take the latest Debian package and stick it on borka. I don't h