Re: [HACKERS] default pg_hba.conf tabulation

2010-01-25 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 05:29:54PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: > > On 1/25/10 1:24 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : > > >> When editing pg_hba.conf, I often instinctively try to use tabs, only to > > >> be slightly annoyed because that barely doesn'

Re: [HACKERS] default pg_hba.conf tabulation

2010-01-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Josh Berkus wrote: > On 1/25/10 1:24 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : > >> When editing pg_hba.conf, I often instinctively try to use tabs, only to > >> be slightly annoyed because that barely doesn't work out relative to the > >> default entries, because those are aligne

Re: [HACKERS] default pg_hba.conf tabulation

2010-01-25 Thread Josh Berkus
On 1/25/10 1:24 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : >> When editing pg_hba.conf, I often instinctively try to use tabs, only to >> be slightly annoyed because that barely doesn't work out relative to the >> default entries, because those are aligned at column 0, 8, 20, 32, 54:

Re: [HACKERS] default pg_hba.conf tabulation

2010-01-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut : > When editing pg_hba.conf, I often instinctively try to use tabs, only to > be slightly annoyed because that barely doesn't work out relative to the > default entries, because those are aligned at column 0, 8, 20, 32, 54: > > # TYPE  DATABASE    USER        CIDR-ADDRES

[HACKERS] default pg_hba.conf tabulation

2010-01-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
When editing pg_hba.conf, I often instinctively try to use tabs, only to be slightly annoyed because that barely doesn't work out relative to the default entries, because those are aligned at column 0, 8, 20, 32, 54: # TYPE DATABASEUSERCIDR-ADDRESS METHOD hostall