Magnus Hagander escribió:
> 2009/12/7 Tom Lane :
> > Magnus Hagander writes:
> >> I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least
> >> the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS
> >> documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally
> >> ba
2009/12/7 Tom Lane :
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least
>> the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS
>> documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally
>> backpatch things like this though, so co
Magnus Hagander writes:
> I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least
> the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS
> documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally
> backpatch things like this though, so comments on that?
The sort o
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:08:28PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 2009/11/26 Tom Lane :
> > Magnus Hagander writes:
> >> I assume you are fine with the addition of some info about git, but
> >> what about the removal of those two chapters suggested?
> >
> > I agree that we needn't try to cover ma
2009/11/26 Tom Lane :
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> I assume you are fine with the addition of some info about git, but
>> what about the removal of those two chapters suggested?
>
> I agree that we needn't try to cover material that's in the CVS manual.
> As somebody mentioned upthread, a sentence
Chris Browne wrote:
Wikis have a habit of getting out of date in ways that make them even
more difficult to rectify, because the data is frequently structured in
a way that doesn't make it particularly easy to pull it out and
transform it into other forms.
The standard way to backup a Mediawik
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> 2009/11/29 Bruce Momjian :
>> Wow, we mention 28k modems --- we are legacy software: ;-)
>>
>> This initial checkout is a little slower than simply downloading
>> a tar.gz file; expect it to take 40 minutes
>> or so if you have a 28.8K modem.
>
> Yes, and what ab
2009/11/29 Bruce Momjian :
> Wow, we mention 28k modems --- we are legacy software: ;-)
>
> This initial checkout is a little slower than simply downloading
> a tar.gz file; expect it to take 40 minutes
> or so if you have a 28.8K modem.
Yes, and what about all the people using carrie
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> I have to say I'm not really impressed by the idea of removing things
> >> from our documentation and replacing them with pages on the wiki. The
> >> documentation is better-written and easier to navigate. Yeah, the
> >> part ab
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I have to say I'm not really impressed by the idea of removing things
>> from our documentation and replacing them with pages on the wiki. The
>> documentation is better-written and easier to navigate. Yeah, the
>> part about 28K modems is pretty sil
Robert Haas wrote:
> I have to say I'm not really impressed by the idea of removing things
> from our documentation and replacing them with pages on the wiki. The
> documentation is better-written and easier to navigate. Yeah, the
> part about 28K modems is pretty silly, but we can fix that witho
pete...@gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
> On ons, 2009-11-25 at 16:27 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Attached is a patch which adds a chapter to git in our documentation,
>> around where we have several chapters about cvs today. It also removes
>> a few very out of date comments about cvs
>
>
Magnus Hagander writes:
> I assume you are fine with the addition of some info about git, but
> what about the removal of those two chapters suggested?
I agree that we needn't try to cover material that's in the CVS manual.
As somebody mentioned upthread, a sentence or two about our branching
and
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 16:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I have to say I'm not really impressed by the idea of removing things
>>> from our documentation and replacing them with pages on the wiki. The
>>> documentation is better-written and easier to
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I have to say I'm not really impressed by the idea of removing things
>> from our documentation and replacing them with pages on the wiki. The
>> documentation is better-written and easier to navigate.
> I agree in general, but information abou
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:29, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On ons, 2009-11-25 at 22:15 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 22:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:29, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On ons, 2009-11-25 at 22:15 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 22:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> > On ons, 2009-11-25 at 16:27 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> In the installation instructions chapter, there is a section "Getting
>> the Source", which could warrant a link or reference to the appropriate
>> instructions on the web site.
>
> I have to say I'm not really impre
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2009-11-25 at 22:15 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 22:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > On ons, 2009-11-25 at 16:27 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >> Attached is a patch which adds a chapter to git in ou
On ons, 2009-11-25 at 22:15 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 22:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On ons, 2009-11-25 at 16:27 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Attached is a patch which adds a chapter to git in our documentation,
> >> around where we have several chapters abo
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 22:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2009-11-25 at 16:27 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Attached is a patch which adds a chapter to git in our documentation,
>> around where we have several chapters about cvs today. It also removes
>> a few very out of date comments a
On ons, 2009-11-25 at 16:27 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Attached is a patch which adds a chapter to git in our documentation,
> around where we have several chapters about cvs today. It also removes
> a few very out of date comments about cvs
I think this whole chapter could be removed and the
Attached is a patch which adds a chapter to git in our documentation,
around where we have several chapters about cvs today. It also removes
a few very out of date comments about cvs (really, nobody has a 28k8
modem and does cvs over it today. Even your cellphone is orders of
magnitude faster than
23 matches
Mail list logo
