Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option

2010-03-01 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> No, it ignores it if libxml2 isn't available. It can be built with >> or without libxslt though. > ugh. > Maybe we need to set up a dummy function or two if not building with > xslt, like we do with the XML functions if not building with libxml. Rig

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option

2010-03-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Robert Haas writes: I thought the contrib makefile was set up to ignore xml2 if libxslt wasn't being used. No, it ignores it if libxml2 isn't available. It can be built with or without libxslt though. ugh. Maybe we need to set up a du

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option

2010-03-01 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > I thought the contrib makefile was set up to ignore xml2 if libxslt > wasn't being used. No, it ignores it if libxml2 isn't available. It can be built with or without libxslt though. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-

Re: [HACKERS] contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option

2010-03-01 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > In yet another demonstration that no good deed goes unpunished, I see > that my addition of regression tests to contrib/xml2 is still a few > bricks shy of a load.  Buildfarm member pika is failing on it, and the > reason is clear upon inspection:

[HACKERS] contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option

2010-03-01 Thread Tom Lane
In yet another demonstration that no good deed goes unpunished, I see that my addition of regression tests to contrib/xml2 is still a few bricks shy of a load. Buildfarm member pika is failing on it, and the reason is clear upon inspection: pika is configured --with-libxml but not --with-libxslt,