Was there any conclusion from these ideas?
---
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:35:56AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think you may be right that using __asm__ __volatile__ in
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think you may be right that using __asm__ __volatile__ in gcc
> S_UNLOCK cases would be a big step forward, but it needs more research
> to see if that's the only fix needed.
Looking through the spinlock implementations in s_lock.h, we start
wi
