> > I don't remember any agreement to remove krb4 in 7.5. Am I wrong?
>
> My recollection is we had at least one person still using it, who
> was apparently unworried by the security issues.
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
As long as people are still using it, I see no reason. Just the ot
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't remember any agreement to remove krb4 in 7.5. Am I wrong?
My recollection is we had at least one person still using it, who was
apparently unworried by the security issues.
While I think deprecating krb4 is a good idea, I don't see any need
to
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I don't remember any agreement to remove krb4 in 7.5. Am I wrong?
It needs to go. I thought the question was when, not if.
In that case there seem to be 2 choices - deprecate in 7.4 and remove in
7.5, or deprecate in 7.5 and remove in following release.
I favor the fo
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > > > auth.c: In function `pg_krb5_recvauth':
> > > > > auth.c:294: structure has no member named `user'
> > > >
> > > > Ooops, my fault --- I didn't build with Kerberos support after
> > > > changing those field names.
> > > >
> > > > Now that I think about it, there m
> > > > auth.c: In function `pg_krb5_recvauth':
> > > > auth.c:294: structure has no member named `user'
> > >
> > > Ooops, my fault --- I didn't build with Kerberos support after
> > > changing those field names.
> > >
> > > Now that I think about it, there might be similar omissions in the
> >
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > auth.c: In function `pg_krb5_recvauth':
> > > auth.c:294: structure has no member named `user'
> >
> > Ooops, my fault --- I didn't build with Kerberos support after
> > changing those field names.
> >
> > Now that I think about it, there might be similar omissions in
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Sean Chittenden writes:
>
> > Keep krb4 in the tree for 7.4, but before 7.4 gets released, the
> > documentation and release notes need to state that krb4 has been
> > depreciated and that it will be removed before 7.5. I'll add submit a
> > patch for the updated verbiag
Sean Chittenden writes:
> Keep krb4 in the tree for 7.4, but before 7.4 gets released, the
> documentation and release notes need to state that krb4 has been
> depreciated and that it will be removed before 7.5. I'll add submit a
> patch for the updated verbiage in a bit. -sc
I object to treati
> > > > auth.c: In function `pg_krb5_recvauth':
> > > > auth.c:294: structure has no member named `user'
> > >
> > > Ooops, my fault --- I didn't build with Kerberos support after
> > > changing those field names.
> > >
> > > Now that I think about it, there might be similar omissions in the
> >
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > auth.c: In function `pg_krb5_recvauth':
> > > auth.c:294: structure has no member named `user'
> >
> > Ooops, my fault --- I didn't build with Kerberos support after
> > changing those field names.
> >
> > Now that I think about it, there might be similar omissions in
10 matches
Mail list logo
