On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/17/13, 10:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps we should just move all the Needs Review and RFC patches forward
>> to the next fest, so we don't forget about them?
>
> This was done the last few times, but it has caused some controversy
On 12/17/13, 10:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Perhaps we should just move all the Needs Review and RFC patches forward
> to the next fest, so we don't forget about them?
This was done the last few times, but it has caused some controversy.
One problem was that a number of patches arrived in this commit
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> Committers should now try to get the Ready for Committer queue cleared.
I'm still hacking on the WITHIN GROUP patch, and will look at the planner
indexes thing after that's done.
> That leaves 8 patches that haven't been reviewed. If you take a look,
> you can imagine
The commit fest is closed. Final score:
Needs Review: 8, Ready for Committer: 13, Committed: 36, Returned with
Feedback: 42, Rejected: 9. Total: 108.
All patches that were in Waiting on Author or Needs Review state and
have received a decent review have been moved to Returned with Feedback
stat
