Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> Also, with the pg_largeobject table, there seems to be no 'owner'
> concept on lobs at all. So is there no problem with any random gumby
> commenting on anyone else's large object?
Not any worse that any random gumby reading or writing anyone else's large
object
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, with the pg_largeobject table, there seems to be no 'owner'
> concept on lobs at all. So is there no problem with any random gumby
> commenting on anyone else's large object?
We don't have a lot of choice. I suppose ideally LOs should
regression=# select oid from pg_cast;
oid
---
16420
16421
16422
16423
16424
... etc ...
It would be a very serious design error if pg_cast didn't have OIDs,
because then pg_cast entries couldn't have dependency entries in
pg_depend.
OK. Weird. I could have _sworn_ I tried that and I d
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it true to say that it's impossible for me to allow comments on
> casts, as there is no OID on the pg_cast table?
Eh?
regression=# select oid from pg_cast;
oid
---
16420
16421
16422
16423
16424
... etc ...
It would be a very s
Hey guys,
Is it true to say that it's impossible for me to allow comments on
casts, as there is no OID on the pg_cast table?
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
