Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-08 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Tuesday 06 of October 2015 17:59:23 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 10/06/2015 05:45 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan > >> wrote: > >>> Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they chang

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 10/06/2015 05:45 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they change in F23 to make it fail? I note that F23 is still in Beta. Maybe, but it's pret

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-06 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 10/06/2015 04:49 PM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they change in F23 to make it fail? I note that F23 is still in Beta. Maybe, but it's pretty unfriendly for us to complain about a library issue

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-06 Thread Thomas Munro
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they change in F23 to make >> it fail? I note that F23 is still in Beta. > > Maybe, but it's pretty unfriendly for us to complain about

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-06 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they change in F23 to make > it fail? I note that F23 is still in Beta. Maybe, but it's pretty unfriendly for us to complain about a library issue, if it is one, by failing an Assert(). Peo

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 10/04/2015 12:52 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they change in F23 to make it fail? I note that F23 is still in Beta. It is working on F22 - so it is looking as regression in some fedora components. can somebody repeat check

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
> Isn't this arguably a Fedora regression? What did they change in F23 to >> make it fail? I note that F23 is still in Beta. >> > It is working on F22 - so it is looking as regression in some fedora components. can somebody repeat check on FC23? Regards Pavel

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
2015-10-04 17:52 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan : > > > On 10/04/2015 11:35 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> >> >> >> > fails on assert >> >> Works for me ... what locale/collation are you running in? >> >> >> LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8 >> >> >> it depends on locale - it is workin

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 10/04/2015 11:35 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > fails on assert Works for me ... what locale/collation are you running in? LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8 it depends on locale - it is working with C or en_US.UTF-8, but doesn't work with Czech locale and fails w

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
>>> > fails on assert >>> >>> Works for me ... what locale/collation are you running in? >>> >> >> LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8 >> > > it depends on locale - it is working with C or en_US.UTF-8, but doesn't > work with Czech locale > and fails with Hungarian locales too > > Pavel > > >> >> Regards >> >> Pav

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
2015-10-04 17:07 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule : > > > 2015-10-04 16:37 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane : > >> Pavel Stehule writes: >> > I am testing PostgreSQL (master) on Fedora 23. The query >> >> > ELECT p1.oid, p1.proname, p2.oid, p2.proname >> > FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2 >> > WHERE p1.oid < p2.oid AN

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
2015-10-04 16:37 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane : > Pavel Stehule writes: > > I am testing PostgreSQL (master) on Fedora 23. The query > > > ELECT p1.oid, p1.proname, p2.oid, p2.proname > > FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2 > > WHERE p1.oid < p2.oid AND > > p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND > > p1.prolang =

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > I am testing PostgreSQL (master) on Fedora 23. The query > ELECT p1.oid, p1.proname, p2.oid, p2.proname > FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2 > WHERE p1.oid < p2.oid AND > p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND > p1.prolang = 12 AND p2.prolang = 12 AND > (p1.proisagg = false

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
#15 0x00469376 in main (argc=8, argv=0x16a45e0) at main.c:223 >> >> Linux yen 4.2.1-300.fc23.x86_64+debug #1 SMP Mon Sep 21 21:58:30 UTC 2015 >> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> gcc (GCC) 5.1.1 20150618 (Red Hat 5.1.1-4) >> >> Postgres 9.4.4 is working well >> > > configured with defaults

Re: [HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
2015-10-04 10:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule : > Hi > > I am testing PostgreSQL (master) on Fedora 23. The query > > ELECT p1.oid, p1.proname, p2.oid, p2.proname > FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2 > WHERE p1.oid < p2.oid AND > p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND > p1.prolang = 12 AND p2.prolang = 12 AN

[HACKERS] check fails on Fedora 23

2015-10-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hi I am testing PostgreSQL (master) on Fedora 23. The query ELECT p1.oid, p1.proname, p2.oid, p2.proname FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2 WHERE p1.oid < p2.oid AND p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 12 AND p2.prolang = 12 AND (p1.proisagg = false OR p2.proisagg = false) AND (