Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-05-14 12:20:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I don't think we want to bump the WAL version code post-beta1.
>>
>> Probably better to assign the modified spgist record a new xl_info ID
>> number, so that a beta1 slave would throw an error for it.
> Since that shi
On 2014-05-14 12:20:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-05-14 10:07:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think that's an OK restriction as long as we warn people about it
> >> (you could update a replication pair as long as you shut them both
> >> down cleanly at the same tim
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-05-14 10:07:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think that's an OK restriction as long as we warn people about it
>> (you could update a replication pair as long as you shut them both
>> down cleanly at the same time, right?). Can the WAL replay routine
>> be made to de
On 2014-05-14 10:07:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> > On 05/13/2014 05:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> What's your plans with your spgist fix? Commit it once 9.5 is branched?
>
> > Good question. I don't know. I would still like to commit it to 9.4. It
> > doesn't requi
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 05/13/2014 05:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> What's your plans with your spgist fix? Commit it once 9.5 is branched?
> Good question. I don't know. I would still like to commit it to 9.4. It
> doesn't require catalog changes, but it's an incompatible change in the
On 2014-05-14 14:55:38 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/13/2014 05:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >That leaves the spgist thing and some infrastructure till we can setup a
> >valgrind animal... From what we've caught with it so far that seems
> >rather worthwile.
> >What's your plans with yo
On 05/13/2014 05:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
That leaves the spgist thing and some infrastructure till we can setup a
valgrind animal... From what we've caught with it so far that seems
rather worthwile.
What's your plans with your spgist fix? Commit it once 9.5 is branched?
Good question. I do
On 2014-05-13 15:33:08 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 10:03 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am not sure whether these are new for 9.4 but they're worth looking at
> >anyway:
> >Valgrind was run with:
> > --trace-children=yes --quiet \
> > --track-origins=yes --leak-chec
On 05/06/2014 10:03 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure whether these are new for 9.4 but they're worth looking at
anyway:
Valgrind was run with:
--trace-children=yes --quiet \
--track-origins=yes --leak-check=no \
--read-var-info=yes \
--suppressions=/home/andres/src/postgresql/s
Hi,
I am not sure whether these are new for 9.4 but they're worth looking at
anyway:
Valgrind was run with:
--trace-children=yes --quiet \
--track-origins=yes --leak-check=no \
--read-var-info=yes \
--suppressions=/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/tools/valgrind.supp \
All seem to be due btree
10 matches
Mail list logo
