On 01/04/2011 04:43 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
OK, what's going here is that, in the newer SDK, IPV6_V6ONLY is defined
unconditionally, but IPPROTO_IPV6 is only defined if _WIN32_WINNT is set to
0x0501 or higher. We defined _WIN32_WINNT as 0x0500 until 9.0, when we
changed it specifically to
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 04:49, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2011 12:15 PM, I wrote:
>>
>> The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using
>> Visual Studio 2008, once the build system is patched. But I don't really
>> know why. HEAD and 9.0 build fine without it. But thos
On 01/03/2011 12:15 PM, I wrote:
The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using
Visual Studio 2008, once the build system is patched. But I don't
really know why. HEAD and 9.0 build fine without it. But those
branches branches fail with a complaint about IPPROTO_IPV6
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander writes:
And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
>>
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> But more importantly, the buildfarm is about more than just "official
> build platform" support.
Agreed, we should be testing as many build platforms as possible. I was
just concerned about whether we were losing any coverage.
regards, tom lane
On 01/03/2011 03:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Page writes:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander writes:
And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
have the buildfarm test
Dave Page writes:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander writes:
>>> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
>>> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
>>> have the buildfarm test something different form what
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> I'm not going to maintain more than one buildfarm member doing MSVC, and and
>>> if we were to adopt your policy I would not be able to use a modern-ish
>>> versio
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Incidentally, I just went looking for VS2005/Express on microsoft.com. I
> don't know if they still make it available, but if they do it's fairly well
> hidden. I could find VS2008/Express and VS2010/Express very easily. ISTM
> that having su
On 01/03/2011 01:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
It might be reasonable to argue that this particular patch
is too invasive to be safe to back-patch, but I don't agree with the
premise that it isn't a reasonable topic for a back-patch.
The patch for the non-buildsystem code is one line. The rest is a
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> I'm not going to maintain more than one buildfarm member doing MSVC, and and
>>> if we were to adopt your policy I would not be able to use a modern-ish
>>> version
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I'm not going to maintain more than one buildfarm member doing MSVC, and and
>> if we were to adopt your policy I would not be able to use a modern-ish
>> version of the compiler/SDK and also build all the live branc
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:08, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/2011 12:43 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 18:15, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>> The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using
>>> Visual
>>> Studio 2008, once the build system is pat
On 01/03/2011 12:43 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 18:15, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using Visual
Studio 2008, once the build system is patched. But I don't really know why.
HEAD and 9.0 build fine without it. But t
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 18:15, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using Visual
> Studio 2008, once the build system is patched. But I don't really know why.
> HEAD and 9.0 build fine without it. But those branches branches fail with a
> complai
The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using
Visual Studio 2008, once the build system is patched. But I don't really
know why. HEAD and 9.0 build fine without it. But those branches
branches fail with a complaint about IPPROTO_IPV6 being undefined.
The patch seems h
16 matches
Mail list logo
