On Sunday 09 August 2009 17:57:23 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 August 2009 03:53:55 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> the documentation of psql's --no-readline option was removed
> >> (psql-ref.sgml v 1.23). I think this was a mistake and it should be
> >> restored :-)
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> the documentation of psql's --no-readline option was removed
> (psql-ref.sgml v 1.23). I think this was a mistake and it should be
> restored :-) I'm quite never sure how far back to take pure docs
> patches, though. Should I just fix HEAD, or HEAD plus 8.4, or all the
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Sunday 09 August 2009 03:53:55 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
the documentation of psql's --no-readline option was removed
(psql-ref.sgml v 1.23). I think this was a mistake and it should be
restored :-)
Does that option have a point? Should the option be removed,
On Sunday 09 August 2009 03:53:55 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> the documentation of psql's --no-readline option was removed
> (psql-ref.sgml v 1.23). I think this was a mistake and it should be
> restored :-)
Does that option have a point? Should the option be removed, perhaps?
--
Sent via pgsql-hac
While following up a comment from Tom on my blog, I discovered that some
9 1/2 years ago in a patch bearing the comment:
Fixed psql double quoting of SQL ids
Fixed libpq printing functions
the documentation of psql's --no-readline option was removed
(psql-ref.sgml v 1.23). I think
